Skip to Content
Math4302Math4302 Modern Algebra (Lecture 22)

Math4302 Modern Algebra (Lecture 22)

Groups

Group acting on a set

Let XX be a GG-set, recall that the orbit of xXx\in X is {gxgG}\{g\cdot x|g\in G\}.

The orbit-stabilizer theorem

For any xXx\in X, ,Gx={gGgx=x}GG_x=\{g\in G|g\cdot x=x\}\leq G.

Let (G:Gx)(G:G_x) denote the index of GxG_x in GG, then (G:Gx)=GGx(G:G_x)=\frac{|G|}{|G_x|}, which equals to the number of left cosets of GxG_x in GG.

Proof

Define α:gGxgx\alpha:gG_x\mapsto g\cdot x.

α\alpha is well-defined and injective.

gGx=gGx    g1gGx    (g1g)x=x    g1(gx)=x    gx=gxgG_x=g'G_x\iff g^{-1}g'\in G_x\iff (g^{-1}g')\cdot x=x\iff g^{-1}\cdot(g'\cdot x)=x\iff g'\cdot x=g\cdot x

α\alpha is surjective, therefore α\alpha is a bijection.

Example

Number of elements in the orbit of xx is 11 if and only if gx=xg\cdot x=x for all gGg\in G.

if and only if Gx=GG_x=G.

Theorem for orbit with prime power groups

Suppose XX is a GG-set, and G=pn|G|=p^n for some prime pp. Let XGX_G be the set of all elements in XX whose orbit has size 11. (Recall the orbit divides XX into disjoint partitions.) Then XXGmodp|X|\equiv |X_G|\mod p.

Examples

Let G=D4G=D_4 acting on {1,2,3,4}=X\{1,2,3,4\}=X.

XG=X_G=\emptyset since there is no element whose orbit has size 11.


Let G=Z11G=\mathbb{Z}_{11} acting on a set with X=20|X|=20 if the action is not trivial, then what is XG|X_G|?

Using the theorem we have XG20mod11=9|X_G|\equiv 20\mod 11=9. Therefore XG=9|X_G|=9 or 2020, but the action is not trivial, XG=9|X_G|=9.

An instance for such X=Z11{x1,x2,,x9}X=\mathbb{Z}_{11}\sqcup\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_9\}, where Z11\mathbb{Z}_{11} acts on {x1,x2,,x9}\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_9\} trivially. and Z11\mathbb{Z}_{11} acts on x1x_1 with addition.

Proof

If xXx\in X such that Gx2|Gx|\geq 2, then GGx=Gx2\frac{|G|}{|G_x|}=|Gx|\geq 2.

So G=GxGx    Gx|G|=|G_x||Gx|\implies |Gx| divides G|G|.

So Gx=pm|Gx|=p^m for some m1m\geq 1.

Note that XX is the union of subset of elements with orbit of size 11, and distinct orbits of sizes 2\geq 2. (each of them has size positive power of pp)

So p(XXG)p|(|X|-|X_G|).

this implies that XGXGmodp|X_G|\equiv |X_G|\mod p.

Corollary: Cauchy’s theorem

If pp is prime and p(G)p|(|G|), then GG has a subgroup of order pp.

This does not hold when pp is not prime.

Consider A4A_4 with order 1212, and A4A_4 has no subgroup of order 66.

Proof

It is enough to show, there is aGa\in G which has order pp: {e,a,a2,,ap1}G\{e,a,a^2,\ldots,a^{p-1}\}\leq G.

Let X={(g1,g2,,gp)giG,g1g2g3gp=e}X=\{(g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p)|g_i\in G,g_1g_2g_3\ldots g_p=e\}.

Then X=Gp1|X|=|G|^{p-1} since gpg_p is determined uniquely by gp=(g1,g2,,gp1)1g_p=(g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_{p-1})^{-1}.

Therefore we can define Zp\mathbb{Z}_p acts on XX by shifting.

iZpi\in \mathbb{Z}_p i(g1,g2,,gp)=(gi+1,g2,,gp,g1,,gi)i\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p)=(g_{i+1},g_2,\ldots,g_p,g_1,\ldots,g_i).

XX is a Zp\mathbb{Z}_p-set.

  • 0(g1,g2,,gp)=(g1,g2,,gp)0\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p)=(g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p).
  • j(i(g1,g2,,gp))=(i+j)(g1,g2,,gp)j\cdot (i\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p))=(i+j)\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p).

By the previous theorem, XXGmodp|X|\equiv |X_G|\mod p.

Since pp divides Gp1|G|^{p-1}, pp also divides XG|X_G|. Therefore (e,e,e,,e)XG(e,e,e,\ldots,e)\in X_G. Therefore XG1|X_G|\geq 1.

So XG2|X_G|\geq 2, we have (a,a,,a)XG(a,a,\ldots,a)\in X_G, aea\neq e, but ap=ea^p=e, so ord(a)=pord(a)=p.

Last updated on