Skip to Content
Math4201Topology I (Lecture 36)

Math4201 Topology I (Lecture 36)

Countable Axioms and Separation Axioms

Separation Axioms

Proposition for T1T_1 spaces

If XX is a topological space such that all singleton are closed, then then following holds:

  • XX is regular if and only if for any point xXx\in X and any open neighborhood VV of XX such that VU\overline{V}\subseteq U.
  • XX is normal if and only if for any closed set AXA\subseteq X, there is an open neighborhood VV of AA such that VU\overline{V}\subseteq U.

Proposition of regular and Hausdorff on subspaces

  1. If XX is a regular topological space, and YY is a subspace. Then YY with induced topology is regular. (same holds for Hausdorff)
  2. If {Xα}\{X_\alpha\} is a collection of regular topological spaces, then their product with the product topology is regular. (same holds for Hausdorff)

Proof

  1. If XX is regular and YXY\subseteq X,then we want to show that YY is regular.

We take a point yYy\in Y and a closed subset AA of YY which doesn’t contain yy.

Observe that AYA\subseteq Y is closed if and only if A=AYA=\overline{A}\cap Y where A\overline{A} is the closure of AA in XX.

Notice that yYy\in Y but yAy\notin A, then yAy\notin \overline{A} (otherwise yAy\in A).

By regularity of XX, we can find an open neighborhood yUXy\in U\subseteq X and AVX\overline{A}\subseteq V\subseteq X and U,VU,V are open and disjoint.

This implies that UYU\cap Y and VYV\cap Y are open neighborhood of yy and AA and disjoint from each other.

(Proof for Hausdorff is similar)


  1. If {Xα}\{X_\alpha\} is a collection of regular topological spaces, then their product with the product topology is regular.

We take a collection of regular spaces {Xα}αI\{X_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}.

We want to show that their product with the product topology is regular.

Take x=(xα)αIαIXα\underline{x}=(x_\alpha)_{\alpha\in I}\in \prod_{\alpha\in I}X_\alpha, any open neighborhood of xx contains a basis element of the form

αIUα\prod_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha

with xαUαx_\alpha\in U_\alpha for all αI\alpha\in I, and all but finitely many UαU_\alpha are equal to XαX_\alpha. (By definition of product topology)

Now for each αi\alpha_i take an open neighborhood VαV_\alpha of xαix_{\alpha_i} such that

  1. VαUα\overline{V_\alpha}\subseteq U_\alpha (This can be cond by regularity of XαX_\alpha)
  2. Vα=XαV_\alpha=X_\alpha if Uα=XαU_\alpha=X_\alpha

The product of αIVα\prod_{\alpha\in I}V_\alpha is an open neighborhood of x\underline{x} and

αIVα=αIVααIUα\overline {\prod_{\alpha\in I}V_\alpha}=\prod_{\alpha\in I}\overline{V_\alpha}\subseteq \prod_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha

Therefore, XX is regular.

(Proof for Hausdorff is similar)

If we replace the regularity with Hausdorffness, then we can take two points x,y\underline{x},\underline{y}. Then there exists α0\alpha_0 such that xα0yα0x_{\alpha_0}\neq y_{\alpha_0}. We can use this to build disjoint open neighborhoods

xα0Uα0Xα0,yα0Vα0Xα0x_{\alpha_0}\in U_{\alpha_0}\subseteq X_{\alpha_0},\quad y_{\alpha_0}\in V_{\alpha_0}\subseteq X_{\alpha_0}

of xα0x_{\alpha_0} and yα0y_{\alpha_0}.

Then we take Uα={Uα0α=α0Xα0otherwiseU_\alpha=\begin{cases} U_{\alpha_0} &\alpha= \alpha_0\\ X_{\alpha_0} & \text{otherwise}\end{cases} and Vα={Vα0α=α0Xα0otherwiseV_\alpha=\begin{cases} V_{\alpha_0} &\alpha= \alpha_0\\ X_{\alpha_0} & \text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

These two sets are disjoint and αIUα\prod_{\alpha\in I}U_{\alpha} and αIVα\prod_{\alpha\in I}V_{\alpha} are open neighborhoods of xx and yy.

Recall that this property does not hold for subspace of normal spaces.

How we construct new normal spaces from existing one

Theorem for constructing normal spaces

  1. Any compact Hausdorff space is normal
  2. Any regular second countable space is normal

Proof

For the first proposition

Earlier we showed that any compact Hausdorff space XX is regular, i.e., for any closed subspace AA of XX and a point xXx\in X not in AA. There are open neighborhoods UxU_x of AA and VxV_x of xx such that UxVx=U_x\cap V_x=\emptyset.

Now let BB be a closed subset of XX disjoint from AA.

For any xBx\in B, we know that we have a disjoint open neighborhood UxU_x of AA and VxV_x of xx.

{Vn}nB\{V_n\}_{n\in \mathbb{B}} gives an open covering of BB, BB is closed subset of a compact space, therefore, BB is compact.

This implies that x1,x2,,xn\exists x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n such that Bi=1nVxiB\subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}.

Ui=1nUxiU\coloneqq \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{x_i} is an open covering of AA.

UxiVxi=U_{x_i}\cap V_{x_i}=\emptyset implies that i=1nUxii=1nVxi=\bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}\cap \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}=\emptyset.

In summary, UU and VV are disjoint open neighborhoods of AA and BB respectively.


We want to show that any regular second countable space is normal.

Take A,BA,B be two disjoint closed subsets of XX. We want to show that we can find disjoint open neighborhoods UU of AA and VV of BB such that UV=U\cap V=\emptyset.

Step 1:

There is a countable open covering {Ui}iI\{U_i\}_{i\in I} of AA such that for any ii, UiB=\overline{U_i}\cap B=\emptyset.

For any xAx\in A, XBX-B is an open neighborhood of xx and by reformulation of regularity, we can find an open set UiU_i' such that UiXB\overline{U_i'}\subseteq X-B.

(We will use the second countability of XX to produce countable open coverings)

Let BB be a countable basis and let UxBU_x\in \mathcal{B} such that xUxUxx\in U_x\subseteq U_x'.

Note that UxUxXB\overline{U_x}\subseteq \overline{U_x'}\subseteq X-B.

and {Ux}xAB\{U_x\}_{x\in A}\subseteq \mathcal{B} is a countable collection.

So this is a countable open covering of AA by relabeling the elements of this open covering we can denote it by {Ui}iN\{U_i\}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}.

Step 2:

There is a countable open covering {Vi}iI\{V_i\}_{i\in I} of BB such that for any ii, ViA=\overline{V_i}\cap A=\emptyset.

Step 3:

Let’s define U^i=Uij=1iVj=Ui(Xj=1iVj)\hat{U}_i=U_i-\bigcup_{j=1}^i\overline{V}_j=U_i\cap (X-\bigcup_{j=1}^i \overline{V}_j), note that (Xj=1iVj)(X-\bigcup_{j=1}^i \overline{V}_j) and UiU_i is open in XX, therefore U^i\hat{U}_i is open in XX.

Since Ai=1UiA\subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty U_i and VjA=\overline{V_j}\cap A=\emptyset, we have i=1U^iA\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{U}_i\supseteq A.

Similarly, we have:

V^i=Vij=1iUj=Vi(Xj=1iUj)\hat{V}_i=V_i-\bigcup_{j=1}^i\overline{U}_j=V_i\cap (X-\bigcup_{j=1}^i \overline{U}_j)

is also open and i=1V^iB\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{V}_i\supseteq B.

Then we claim that these two open neighborhoods U=i=1U^iU=\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{U}_i and V=i=1V^iV=\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{V}_i are disjoint.

To see this, we proceed by contradiction, suppose xi=1U^ii=1V^ix\in \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{U}_i\cap \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{V}_i, xi=1U^ix\in \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{U}_i and xi=1V^ix\in \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{V}_i.

xi=1U^ix\in \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty \hat{U}_i implies that k\exists k such that xU^kx\in \hat{U}_k and l\exists l such that xV^lx\in \hat{V}_l.

Suppose without loss of generality that klk\leq l.

Then xU^kUkx\in \hat{U}_k\subseteq U_k, and xV^x\in \hat{V} implies that jl:xUj\forall j\leq l:x\notin U_j. This gives xUkx\notin U_k.

This is a contradiction.

Therefore, UU and VV are disjoint.

Last updated on