Math416 Lecture 6
Review
Linear Fractional Transformations
Transformations of the form , and are called linear fractional transformations.
Theorem 3.8 Preservation of clircles
We defined clircle to be a circle or a line.
The circle equation is:
Let be the center of the circle, be the radius of the circle.
This is:
If is a non-constant linear fractional transformation, then maps clircles to clircles.
We claim that a map is circle preserving if and only if for some .
when , it is a line.
when , it is a circle.
Proof
Let , so .
Then the original equation becomes:
Which is in the form of circle equation.
Chapter 4 Elementary functions
So, following the definition of , we have:
The exponential of is defined as:
So,
Theorem 4.3 is holomorphic
is holomorphic on .
Proof
Theorem 4.4 is periodic
is periodic with period .
Proof
Theorem 4.5 as a map
is a map from to with period .
This is a map from cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates, where is the radius and is the angle.
This map attains every value in .
Definition 4.6-8 and
From this definition, we can see that and are no longer bounded in the complex plane.
And this definition is still compatible with the previous definition of and when is real.
Moreover,
Logarithm
Definition 4.9 Logarithm
A logarithm of is any such that .
If , then no logarithm exists.
If , then there exists infinitely many logarithms of .
Let , be a logarithm of .
Then,
Since logarithm is not unique, we can always add to the angle.
If , then means and .
If , then .
Definition 4.10 of Branch of and
Let be an open connected subset of .
A branch of in is a continuous function , such that is a value of .
A branch of in is a continuous function , such that .
Note: has a branch of if and only if it has a branch of .
Proof
Suppose there exists such that , , then is a branch of .
Suppose there exists such that , , then is a branch of .
If , then not branch of exists.
Corollary of 4.10
Suppose and are two branches of in .
Then,
for some .
Suppose and are two branches of in .
Then,
for some .
Theorem 4.11
is holomorphic on .
Proof (continue on next lecture)
Method 1: Use polar coordinates. (See in homework)
Method 2: Use the fact that is the inverse of .
Suppose , , . So
Continue next time.