Math416 Lecture 4
Review
Derivative of a complex function
Angle between two curves
Let be two curves in with for some .
The angle between and at is the angle between the vectors and . Denote as .
Cauchy-Riemann equations
Continue on last lecture
Theorem of conformality
Suppose is holomorphic function on open set and are regular curves in with for some .
If , then the angle between and at is the same as the angle between the vectors and .
Lemma of function of a curve and angle
If is holomorphic function on open set and is differentiable curve in with for some .
Then,
Looks like the chain rule.
Proof
We want to show that
Notation:
A function is if such that for all in a neighborhood of .
A function is if .
is differentiable if and only if as . (By Taylor expansion)
Since is holomorphic at , we have
This result comes from Taylor Expansion of the derivative of the function around the point
and
So,
Definition 2.12 (Conformal function)
A function is called conformal if it preserves the angle between two curves.
Theorem 2.13 (Conformal function)
If is conformal at , then is holomorphic at and .
Example:
is not conformal at because .
Lemma of conformal function
Suppose is real differentiable, let , .
Let . Then .
Proof
, are real differentiable.
Theorem of differentiability
Let be a function defined on an open set that is both holomorphic and (real) differentiable, where with real differentiable functions.
Then, is conformal at every point if and only if is holomorphic at and .
Proof
We prove the equivalence in two parts.
() Suppose that is conformal at . By definition, conformality means that preserves angles (including their orientation) between any two intersecting curves through . In the language of real analysis, this requires that the (real) derivative (Jacobian) of at , , acts as a similarity transformation. Any similarity in can be written as a rotation combined with a scaling; in particular, its matrix representation has the form
for some real numbers and . This is exactly the matrix corresponding to multiplication by the complex number . Therefore, the Cauchy-Riemann equations must hold at , implying that is holomorphic at . Moreover, because the transformation is nondegenerate (preserving angles implies nonzero scaling), we must have .
() Now suppose that is holomorphic at and . Then by the definition of the complex derivative, the first-order (linear) approximation of near is
for small . Multiplication by the nonzero complex number is exactly a rotation and scaling (i.e., a similarity transformation). Therefore, for any smooth curve with , we have
and the angle between any two tangent vectors at is preserved (up to the fixed rotation). Hence, is conformal at .
For further illustration, consider the special case when is an affine map.
Case 1: Suppose
The Wirtinger derivatives of are
For to be holomorphic, we require . Moreover, to have a nondegenerate (angle-preserving) map, we must have . If , then the map mixes and , and one can check that the linearization maps the real axis into the set , which does not uniformly scale and rotate all directions. Thus, fails to be conformal when .
Case 2: For a general holomorphic function, the lemma of conformal functions shows that if
for any differentiable curve through , then the effect of near is exactly given by multiplication by . Since multiplication by a nonzero complex number is a similarity transformation, is conformal at .
Harmonic function
Let be a domain in . A function
A domain is a connected open set.
Say is harmonic if it satisfies the Laplace equation
Theorem of harmonic conjugate
Let be holomorphic function on domain . Then and are harmonic functions on .
Proof
Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we have
So,
If is such that is holomorphic on , then is called harmonic conjugate of on .
Example:
is harmonic on .
To find a harmonic conjugate of on , we need to find a function such that
Integrating, we get
So,
is a harmonic conjugate of on .
Combine and to get , which is holomorphic on .