Skip to Content
Math416Complex Variables (Lecture 15)

Math416 Lecture 15

Review on Cauchy Integrals

The cauchy integral of function ϕ\phi (may not be holomorphic) on curve Γ\Gamma (may not be closed) is

Γϕ(ζ)ζzdζ\int_{\Gamma}\frac{\phi(\zeta)}{\zeta-z}d\zeta

The Cauchy integral theorem states that if ff is holomorphic on a simply connected domain DD, then the integral of ff over any closed curve γ\gamma in DD is 0.

γf(z)dz=0\int_{\gamma}f(z)dz = 0

The Cauchy integral formula states that if ff is holomorphic on a simply connected domain DD, then ff over any closed curve γ\gamma in DD is

f(z)=12πiγf(ζ)ζzdζf(z) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma}\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta-z}d\zeta

Continue on Cauchy Integrals (Chapter 7)

Convergence of functions

Theorem 7.15 Weierstrass Convergence Theorem

Limit of a sequence of holomorphic functions is holomorphic.

Let GG be an open subset of C\mathbb{C} and let (fn)nN\left(f_n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence of holomorphic functions on GG that converges locally uniformly to ff on GG. Then ff is holomorphic on GG.

Proof:

Let z0Gz_0\in G. There exists a neighborhood Br(z0)G\overline{B_r(z_0)}\subset G of z0z_0 such that (fn)nN\left(f_n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly on Br(z0)\overline{B_r(z_0)}.

Let Cr=Br(z0)C_r=\partial B_r(z_0).

By Cauchy integral formula, we have

fn(z0)=12πiCrfn(ζ)ζz0dζf_n(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{C_r}\frac{f_n(\zeta)}{\zeta-z_0}d\zeta

zBr(z0)\forall z\in B_r(z_0), we have f(w)wζ\frac{f(w)}{w-\zeta} converges uniformly on CrC_r.

So limnfn(z0)=f(z0)=12πiCrf(w)wz0dw\lim_{n\to\infty}f_n(z_0) = f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{C_r}\frac{f(w)}{w-z_0}dw

So ff is holomorphic on GG.

QED

Theorem 7.16 Maximum Modulus Principle

If ff is a non-constant holomorphic function on a domain DD (open and connected subset of C\mathbb{C}), then f|f| does not attain a local maximum value on DD.

Proof:

Assume at some point z0Dz_0\in D, f(z0)|f(z_0)| is a local maximum. r>0\exists r>0 such that zBr(z0)\forall z\in \overline{B_r(z_0)}, f(z)f(z0)|f(z)|\leq |f(z_0)|.

If f(z0)=0f(z_0)=0, then f(z)f(z) is identically 0 on Br(z0)B_r(z_0). (by identity theorem)

Else, we can assume that without loss of generality that f(z0)>0f(z_0)>0. By mean value theorem,

f(z0)=12π02πf(z0+reiθ)dθf(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}f(z_0+re^{i\theta})d\theta

So f(z0)=f(z_0) =

/* TRACK LOST */

Corollary 7.16.1 Minimum Modulus Principle

If ff is a non-constant holomorphic function on a domain DD (open and connected subset of C\mathbb{C}), and ff is non zero on DD, then 1f\frac{1}{f} does not attain a local minimum value on DD.

Proof:

Let g(z)=1f(z)g(z) = \frac{1}{f(z)}. gg is holomorphic on DD.

QED

Theorem 7.17 Schwarz Lemma

Let ff be a holomorphic map of the open unit disk DD into itself, and f(0)=0f(0)=0. Then zD\forall z\in D, f(z)z|f(z)|\leq |z| and f(0)1|f'(0)|\leq 1.

And the equality holds if and only if ff is a rotation, that is, f(z)=eiθzf(z)=e^{i\theta}z for some θR\theta\in\mathbb{R}.

Proof:

Let

g(z)={f(z)zz0f(0)z=0g(z) = \begin{cases} \frac{f(z)}{z} & z\neq 0 \\ f'(0) & z=0 \end{cases}

We claim that gg is holomorphic on DD.

For z0z\neq 0, g(z)g(z) is holomorphic since ff is holomorphic on DD.

For z=0z=0, g(z)g(z) is holomorphic since ff‘s power series expansion has c0=f(0)=0c_0=f(0)=0. g(0)=f(0)=c1+c2z+c3z2+g'(0)=f'(0)=c_1+c_2z+c_3z^2+\cdots.

So gg is (analytic) thus holomorphic on DD.

On the boundary of DD, g(z)1r1|g(z)|\leq\frac{1}{r} \cdot 1. By maximum modulus principle, g(z)1|g(z)|\leq 1 on DD.

So f(z)z|f(z)|\leq |z| on DD.

And f(0)1|f'(0)|\leq 1.

QED

Schwarz-Pick Lemma

Let ff be a holomorphic map of the open unit disk DD into itself, then for any z,wDz,w\in D,

f(z)f(w)1f(w)f(z)zw1wz=ρ(z,w)\frac{|f(z)-f(w)|}{|1-\overline{f(w)}f(z)|}\leq\frac{|z-w|}{|1-\overline{w}z|}=\rho(z,w)

Prove after spring break.

Last updated on