Skip to Content
Math416Complex Variables (Lecture 14)

Math 416 Lecture 14

Review

Holomorphic     \iff Analytic

Theorem 7.11 Liouville’s Theorem

Any bounded entire function is constant.

New Rollings

Finding power series for holomorphic functions

Let FF be holomorphic on open set UCU\subset \mathbb{C}. Suppose f(z0)=0f(z_0)=0, f(z)=n=0an(zz0)nf(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z - z_0)^n

Example,

p(z)=(z1)3(z+i)5(z7)p(z)=(z-1)^3(z+i)^5(z-7)

p(z)=n=09cn(zz0)np(z)=\sum_{n=0}^9 c_n(z-z_0)^n

Notice that:

Since f(z)=n=0ann(zz0)n1f'(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n n(z-z_0)^{n-1}. a0=f(z0)a_0=f(z_0), a1=f(z0)a_1=f'(z_0), ak=f(k)(z0)k!a_k=\frac{f^{(k)}(z_0)}{k!} for k0k \geq 0

So c0=0=f(1)c_0=0=f(1), c1=f(1)=3(z1)2M=0c_1=f'(1)=3(z-1)^2M=0, c2=f(1)=6(z1)M=0c_2=f''(1)=6(z-1)M=0, c3=1c_3=1.

(i) The power series for q(z)=(z1)3q(z)=(z-1)^3 at 00.

So q(z)=n=03anznq(z)=\sum_{n=0}^3 a_nz^n, you just expand it as q(z)=z33z2+3z1q(z)=z^3-3z^2+3z-1

(ii) The power series for q(z)=(z1)3q(z)=(z-1)^3 at 1-1.

So q(z)=n=03an(z+1)nq(z)=\sum_{n=0}^3 a_n(z+1)^n

a0=q(1)=(2)3=8a_0=q(-1)=(-2)^3=-8,

a1=q(1)=3(2)2=12a_1=q'(-1)=3(-2)^2=12,

a2=12q(1)=6221=6a_2=\frac{1}{2}q''(-1)=\frac{6}{2} \cdot -2^1 = -6,

a3=16q(1)=661=1a_3=\frac{1}{6}q'''(-1)=\frac{6}{6} \cdot 1=1.

All higher terms are zero

Definition: zero of multiplicity

Suppose ff is holomorphic on open UU and f(ζ0)=0f(\zeta_0)=0 for some z0Uz_0\in U. Let f(z)=n=0an(zz0)nf(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^n near z0z_0. Let mm be the smallest number such that am0a_m\neq 0. Then we say ff has a zero of multiplicity mm at z0z_0.

Theorem 7.12 Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Every non-constant polynomial ff can be factored over C\mathbb{C} into linear factors

Proof:

Since an=1n!f(n)(z0)a_n=\frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(z_0), then ff has a zero of order mm     \iff f(m)(z0)0f^{(m)}(z_0) \neq 0 and f(k)(z0)=0,k<mf^{(k)}(z_0) = 0, \forall k < m.

Suppose ff has a zero of order mm at z0z_0

f(z)=am(zz0)m+am+1(zz0)m+1+=(zz0)m[am+1(zz0)m+1+]=(zz0)mg(z)\begin{aligned} f(z)&=a_m(z-z_0)^m+a_{m+1}(z-z_0)^{m+1}+\cdots\\ &=(z-z_0)^m\left[a_{m+1}(z-z_0)^{m+1}+\cdots\right]\\ &= (z-z_0)^m g(z) \end{aligned}

So, if ff has a zero of order mm at ζ0    \zeta_0\iff f(z)=(zz0)mg(z)f(z)=(z-z_0)^mg(z) where gg is holomorphic and g(z0)0g(z_0)\neq 0.

QED

Definition: Connected Set

An open set UU is connected if whenever U=U1U2U=U_1\cup U_2 and U1,U2U_1, U_2 are disjoint and open, then one of them is empty.

A domain is a connected open set.

Theorem 7.13 Zeros of Holomorphic Functions

Let UU be a open domain (in C\mathbb{C}). Let ff be holomorphic on UU and vanish to infinite order at some point z0Uz_0\in U, then f(z)=0f(z)=0 on UU.

This is not true for R\mathbb{R}. Consider the function f(x)=e1/x2f(x) = e^{-1/x^2} for x0x \neq 0 and f(0)=0f(0) = 0, which is smooth and vanishes to infinite order at 0.

Proof:

Step 1:

Show any zero of finite order is isolated.

Let z0z_0 be a zero of order mm, then by fundamental theorem of algebra, ff can be expressed as

f(z)=(zz0)mg(z)f(z)=(z-z_0)^mg(z)

where gg is holomorphic and g(z0)0g(z_0) \neq 0. So gg is continuous.

Thus \exists and open set z0Vz_0\in V such that g(z0)0g(z_0)\neq 0 on all of VV.

Let U1={zU}U_1=\{z\in U\} such that ff vanishes to order infinity. and U2=UU1U_2=U\setminus U_1.

We need to show both U1U_1 and U2U_2 are open.

U1U_1:

Let z0U1z_0\in U_1. We know that ff is holomorphic thus it is analytic at z0z_0.

So ϵ>0\exists \epsilon>0 such that zBϵ(z0)\forall \mathbb{z}\in B_\epsilon(z_0)

So f(z)=n=0an(zz0)nf(z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n(z-z_0)^n implies f(z)=0f(z)=0 on Bϵ(z0)B_\epsilon(z_0)

We can expand ff in a power series centered at z1z_1 for any z1Bϵ(z0)z_1\in B_\epsilon(z_0), So f(z)=cn(zz1)n=0f(z)=\sum c_n(z-z_1)^n=0

Therefore, z1U1z_1 \in U_1, proving that U1U_1 is open.

U2U_2:

Let wU2w\in U_2, if f(w)0f(w)\neq 0, then ϵ>0\exists\epsilon > 0 such that f(z)0f(z) \neq 0 on Bϵ(w)U2B_\epsilon(w)\subset U_2.

If ff vanishes to finite order by Step 1, Bϵ(w)U2\exists B_\epsilon(w)\subset U_2

QED

Corollary 7.13.1 (Identity for holomorphic functions)

If f,gf,g are both holomorphic on domain UU, and they have the same power series at some point ζ0\zeta_0, then fgf \equiv g on UU.

Proof:

Consider fgf-g.

QED

Corollary 7.13.2

Let UU be a domain, fO(U)f\in O(U), ff is not identically zero on UU, f1(0)f^{-1}(0) has no limit point on UU.

Proof:

We proceed by contradiction. Suppose znwUz_n\to w\in U, f(z0)=0f(z_0)=0, f(w)=0f(w)=0. ww is not an isolated zero. So ff is a zero of infinite order. Contradicting with our assumption that ff is not identically zero.

QED

Corollary 7.14: Identity principle

If f,gO(U)f,g\in O(U), UU is a domain and \exists sequence z0z_0 that converges to wUw\in U, such that f(zn)=g(zn)f(z_n)=g(z_n), then fgf\equiv g on U$.

Last updated on