Math4121 Lecture 16
Continue on Patches for Riemann Integrals
Harnack’s Mistake
Theorem 3.6 Heine-Borel Theorem
If is a collection of open sets which cover , then there exists a finite subcover, i.e. such that .
Using the fact that is compact.
Proof:
Define .
If we can show that , then we are done.
Clearly since .
Let . If we can show that , then we are done. (taking to take finite subcover)
Suppose toward contradiction that .
Then and such that .
Since , s.t. .
So .
So , this contradicts the definition of as the supremum of .
So .
QED
Reviewing sections for Math 4111
Definition: Cardinality
Two sets and have the same cardinality if there exists a bijection .
We can imaging the cardinality as the number of elements in the set. However, this is not rigorous, for example, the set of rational and irrational numbers are both infinite, but the set of rational numbers are countable while the set of irrational numbers are uncountable.
- the cardinality of a finite set is the number of elements in the set.
- the cardinality of is , such a set is called “countable”.
Definition: Countable
A set is countable if there exists an injection .
Example:
-
The set of integers is countable.
We can construct a bijection by mapping
-
The set of rational numbers is countable.
We can construct a bijection using the
-
The algebraic numbers (roots of polynomials with integer coefficients) are countable.
Proof using the union of countable sets is countable .
Definition: Uncountable
A set is uncountable if it is not countable.
Theorem: is uncountable
Easy proof using Cantor’s diagonal argument .
A new one
Proof:
Suppose . Let be the first two entries in our list which lie in .
Let be the first two entries such that .
Continue this process, we can construct sets.
By the nested interval theorem of real numbers, .
Setting (by the least upper bound property of real numbers), for all . Since , for some . Then find which come after in the list.
This contradicts the assumption that as the first element in the list.
QED