Skip to Content
Math4111Introduction to Real Analysis (Lecture 8)

Lecture 8

Review

Let (X,d)(X,d) be a metric space. Recall that Br(x)={zX:d(x,z)<r}B_r(x)=\{z\in X:d(x,z)<r\}.

Let x,yXx,y\in X and let r=12d(x,y)r=\frac{1}{2}d(x,y). What do you think is true about Br(x)Br(y)B_r(x)\cap B_r(y)? Can you prove it?

It should be empty. Proof any point cannot be in two balls at the same time. (By triangle inequality or contradiction)

Metric space defs

  1. pX,r>0p\in X,r>0, Br(p)={qX:d(p,q)<r}B_r(p)=\{q\in X:d(p,q)<r\}, also called neighborhood.
  2. pp is a limit point of E(pE)E(p\in E') if r>0\forall r>0, (Bs(p)E)\{p}ϕ(B_s(p)\cap E)\backslash \{p\}\neq \phi
  3. If pEp\in E and pp is not a limit point of EE, then pp is called an isolated point of EE.
  4. EE is closed if EEE'\subset E
  5. pp is a interior point of E(pE)E(p\in E^{\circ}) if r>0\exists r>0 such that Br(p)EB_r(p)\subset E.

New materials

Metric space

Theorem 2.20

pE    r>0,Br(p)Ep\in E'\implies \forall r>0,B_r(p)\cap E is infinite.

Proof

We will prove the contrapositive.

want to prove r>0\exists r>0 such that Br(p)EB_r(p)\cap E is finite     pE\implies p\notin E' (s>0\exists s>0 such that (Bs(p)E)\{p}=ϕ(B_s(p)\cap E)\backslash \{p\}=\phi)

Suppose r>0\exists r>0 such that Br(p)EB_r(p)\cap E is finite

let Bs(p)E)\{p}=q1,...,qnB_s(p)\cap E)\backslash \{p\}={q_1,...,q_n}

  • If n=0n=0, then Bs(p)E)\{p}=ϕB_s(p)\cap E)\backslash \{p\}=\phi, so pEp\in E'

  • If n1n\geq 1, then let s=min{d(p,qm):1mn}s=min\{d(p,q_m):1\leq m\leq n\}

    Each d(p,qm)d(p,q_m) is positive and the set is finite, so s>0s>0.

Then (Bs(p)E)\{p}=ϕ(B_s(p)\cap E)\backslash \{p\}=\phi, so pEp\notin E

Theorem 2.22 De Morgan’s law

(aEa)c=a(Eac)\left(\bigcup_a E_a\right)^c=\bigcap_a(E^c_a)

Ec=X\EE^c=X\backslash E

Proof:

xaAEx    aAx\in \cup_{a\in A} E_x\iff \exists a\in A such that xEax\in E_a

So x(aEa)c    aA,xEa    aA,xEac    a(Eac)x\in \left(\bigcup_a E_a\right)^c\iff \forall a\in A, x\notin E_a\iff \forall a\in A,x\in E_a^c\iff \bigcap_a(E^c_a)

Theorem 2.23

EE is open     \iff EcE^c is closed.

Warning: EE is open     \cancel{\iff} EE is closed. EE is closed     \cancel{\iff} EE is open.

Example:
ϕ\phi, R\R is both open and closed. “clopen set”
[0,1)[0,1) is not open and not closed. bad…

Proof

    \impliedby Suppose EcE^c is closed. Let xEx\in E, so xEcx\notin E^c

EcE^c is closed and xEc    x(Ec)    r>0x\notin E^c\implies x\notin (E^c)'\implies \exists r >0 such that (Br(x)Ec)\{x}=ϕ(B_r(x)\cap E^c)\backslash \{x\}=\phi

So ϕ=(Br(x)Ec)\{x}=Br(x)Ec\phi=(B_r(x)\cap E^c)\backslash \{x\}=B_r(x)\cap E^c

So Br(x)EB_r(x)\in E

    \implies

Suppose EE is open

x(Ec)    r>0,(Br(x)Ec)\{x}ϕ    r>0,(Br(x)Ec)ϕ    r>0,Br(x)E    xE    xE    xEc\begin{aligned} x\in (E^c)'&\implies \forall r>0, (B_r(x)\cap E^c)\backslash \{x\}\neq \phi\\ &\implies \forall r>0, (B_r(x)\cap E^c)\neq \phi\\ &\implies \forall r>0, B-r(x)\notin E\\ &\implies x\notin E^{\circ}\\ &\implies x\notin E\\ &\implies x\in E^c \end{aligned}

So (Ec)Ec(E^c)'\subset E^c

Theorem 2.24

An arbitrary union of open sets is open

Proof

Suppose α,Gα\forall \alpha, G_\alpha is open. Let xαGαx\in \bigcup _{\alpha} G_\alpha. Then α0\exists \alpha_0 such that xGα0x\in G_{\alpha_0}. Since Gα0G_{\alpha_0} is open, r>0\exists r>0 such that Br(x)Gα0B_r(x)\subset G_{\alpha_0} Then Br(x)Gα0αGαB_r(x)\subset G_{\alpha_0}\subset \bigcup_{\alpha} G_\alpha

A finite intersection of open set is open

Proof

Suppose i{1,...,n}\forall i\in \{1,...,n\}, GiG_i is open.

Let xi=1nGix\in \bigcap^n_{i=1}G_i, then i{1,..,n}\forall i\in \{1,..,n\} and GiG_i is open, so ri>0\exists r_i>0, such that Bri(x)GiB_{r_i}(x)\subset G_i

Let r=min{r1,...,rn}r=min\{r_1,...,r_n\}. Then i{1,...,n}\forall i\in \{1,...,n\}. Br(x)Bri(x)GiB_r(x)\subset B_{r_i}(x)\subset G_i. So Br(x)i=1nGiB_r(x)\subset \bigcup_{i=1}^n G_i

The other two can be proved by Theorem 2.22,2.23

Definition 2.26

The closure Eˉ=EE\bar{E}=E\cup E'

Remark: Using the definition of EE', we have, Eˉ={pX,r>0,Br(p)Eϕ}\bar{E}=\{p\in X,\forall r>0,B_r(p)\cap E\neq \phi\}

Definition 2.27

Eˉ\bar {E} is closed.

Proof

We will show Eˉc\bar{E}^c is open.

Suppose pEˉcp\in \bar{E}^c. Then by remark, r>0\exists r>0 such that Br(p)E=ϕB_r(p)\cap E=\phi (a)

Furthermore,, we claim Br(p)E=ϕB_r(p)\cap E'=\phi (b)

Suppose for contradiction that qBr(p)E\exists q\in B_r(p)\cap E' By Theorem 2.19, s>0\exists s>0 such that Bs(q)Br(p)B_s(q)\subset B_r(p)

Since qE,(Bs(q)E)\{q}ϕq\in E',(B_s(q)\cap E)\backslash \{q\}\neq \phi. This implies Br(p)E=ϕB_r(p)\cap E=\phi, which contradicts with (a)

This proves (b)

So Eˉc\bar{E}^c is open

Last updated on